Varicocele and Fertility

Home » Male » Varicocele and Fertility

By



Attention: You are prohibited from using or uploading content you accessed through this website into external applications, bots, software, or websites, including those using artificial intelligence technologies and infrastructure, including deep learning, machine learning and large language models and generative AI.

This content is WordProof timestamped

Varicocele and Fertility

Key Points:

  • Varicoceles of any grade can decrease sperm count and quality.
  • Surgery is the first-line treatment option to increase sperm count for men with varicocele.
  • Total Motile Sperm Count improves for approximately 50% of men with varicocele after surgery.
  • After surgery 70% of men with varicoceles also see a significant increase in testosterone levels (i.e. mean increase of 178ng/dL).

Varicoceles are present in 15% of all men and up to 40% of men with infertility. Varicoceles are also implicated in 80% of previously fertile males who are unable to conceive another child (i.e. secondary infertility). Hence 8 in 10 men with varicoceles can conceive naturally without any medical treatment (e.g. surgery, medication). Although this is most likely to occur in males with normal sperm parameters who have not already been trying to conceive already for 12 months or longer.

Infertility is defined as the failure to achieve a pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse.

After 12 months of trying to conceive, unsuccessful couples are encouraged to see their doctor for a preliminary examination. If no female and male factors are found (e.g. palpable varicoceles), and both partners are still young (<30 years old), the doctor may recommend to continue trying to conceive for another 12 months (watchful waiting) as studies show 50% of infertile couples manage to get pregnant naturally during this time.

However, if the age of either partner is a contraindication to watchful waiting the doctor may recommend varicocele treatment especially if semen analysis, sperm DNA fragmentation, hormone levels, varicocele grade or venous reflux indicate a negative effect on fertility.

Contrary to clinical practice guidelines, studies show that men with grade 0 varicocele and at least one abnormal sperm parameter see a statistically significant improvement in sperm parameters and hormone levels after varicocele treatment.

StudyNo. of menStudy durationSperm Concentration (million/mL)Sperm Motility (%)Total Motile Count (million)
Thirumavalavan N, et al. (2018)4612 monthsN/AN/A+7.7
Cantoro U, et al. (2015)2186 months+20.9+14.2N/A
Seo J T, et al. (2009)256 months+18.2-6.1*N.A
Yamamoto M, et al. (1996)4512 months+5.9+1.5*+9.8
Dhabuwala C B, et al. (1992)1612 months+14.4-2.2*N/A
Table 1: Summary of abnormal semen parameters and grade 0 varicocele treatment results across various studies. * = not significant.

In fact, studies show that even men with normal sperm parameters and grade 0 varicocele who have been unable to conceive (i.e. subfertile) see a significant increase in sperm concentration 6 months later after surgery.

StudyNo. of menStudy durationSperm Concentration
(million/mL)
BeforeAfter
McGarry P, et al. (2015) 326 months3250
Unal D, et al. (2001)216 months4860
Table 2: Summary of normal semen parameters and grade 0 varicocele treatment results.

Experts report this improvement in sperm concentration is most likely to occur among men with undeniable subclinical varicocele displaying long or very long venous blood reflux.

However, sperm DNA fragmentation fails to decrease significantly post-surgery for the majority of men with grade 0 varicocele according to a small study by García-Peiró et al.

Test methodNon-treated (n=16)Treated (n=10)
TUNEL (%)31.429.0
SCSA (%)21.326.1
SCD (%)37.829.0
DDS (%)19.517.5
Table 3: Sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile males with nontreated and treated grade 0 varicocele according to 4 unique tests.

Overall, this improvement in sperm quality post-surgery of grade 0 varicocele is enough to increase the chances of natural conception (Table 4) and decrease the need for IVF or IUI in some cases (Table 5).

StudyStudy durationPregnancy rate
TreatmentNo Treatment
Seo J T, et al. (2009)2 years60% (12/20)19% (3/16)
Cantoro U, et al. (2015)4 years46% (101/218)12% (14/119)
Table 4: Grade 0 varicocele spontaneous pregnancy rates after treatment vs. no treatment.

No. of menIVFIUINatural
IVF group post-surgery2259%5%36%
IUI group post-surgery50%20%80%
Natural group post-surgery1911%5%84%
Table 5: Change in recommended fertility treatment after grade 0 varicocele surgery.

Men with grade 1 varicocele have on average 19% lower sperm count per milliliter than men without palpable varicocele. As a result, a higher percentage of men with grade 1 varicocele have low sperm count and thus abnormal sperm quality (35.1% vs. 31.4%).

Grade 1 varicocele vs no varicocele

Accordingly, men with grade 1 varicocele and abnormal sperm quality normally see a significant improvement in sperm parameters, 6 months post-surgery, which increases the probability of spontaneous pregnancy according to a validated nomogram. This is most likely to occur in men presenting with poor testicular tissue health and or testosterone levels below average.

Nomogram to predict spontaneous pregnancy after microscopic varicocelectomy.

Men with grade 2 varicocele have on average 32% lower sperm count per milliliter than men with grade 0 varicocele. As a result, a much higher percentage of men with grade 2 varicocele have low sperm count and thus abnormal sperm quality (40.4% vs. 31.4%).

Grade 2 varicocele vs no varicocele

These men also display increased levels of reactive oxygen species, lower testicular volumes and decreased tissue health compared to men with grade 1 varicocele. Consequently, men with grade 2 varicocele and abnormal sperm quality often see a significant improvement in sperm parameters, 6 months post-surgery.

Grade 1 vs Grade 2 varicocele testicular volume
Grade 1 vs Grade 2 vs Grade 3 varicocele post-surgery sperm parameters

Men with grade 3 varicocele have on average 64% lower sperm count per milliliter than men with grade 0 varicocele. As a result, a majority of men with grade 3 varicocele have low sperm count and thus abnormal sperm quality (54.9% vs. 31.4%).

Grade 3 varicocele vs no varicocele

These men also display significantly lower testicular volume and tissue health compared to men with grade 2 varicocele resulting in significant changes to hormone levels (low testosterone, high FSH). Therefore, men with grade 3 varicocele and abnormal sperm quality normally see the greatest improvement in sperm parameters, 6 months post-surgery.

Grade 3 vs Grade 2 varicocele testicular volume
Grade 1 vs Grade 2 vs Grade 3 varicocele post-surgery sperm parameters

This improvement in sperm parameters and of course testicular health means 16% of men with grade 3 varicocele achieve spontaneous pregnancy 6 months post-surgery. Comparatively, only 1% of men with grade 3 varicocele had a spontaneous pregnancy whilst waiting 6 months for surgery.

Grade 3 varicocele post-surgery pregnancies

As shown above, the probability of pregnancy slowly increases to 41% of men 3 years after varicocele surgery. This suggests the reversal of testicular atrophy and restoration of spermatogenesis is a slow process with no guarantees. In fact, 3 years after grade 3 varicocele surgery, almost 6 in 10 men would still need Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) treatment to help them conceive.

Determining whether or not varicocele treatment will improve your sperm quality and fertility is challenging for doctors.

Although sperm concentration (i.e. sperm count per ml) is negatively impacted by varicocele, experts consider total sperm count a better indicator of spermatogenesis function since it is less variable (i.e. not affected by fluctuating semen volume).

However, natural conception also requires motile sperm. Thus studies reporting fertility outcomes always report total motile sperm count (TMSC) or total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC).

So even though studies clearly show that varicoceles negatively affect sperm parameters, only 1 in 2 infertile men see a significant improvement in TMSC post-surgery. Unfortunately, this means for almost 50% of men with varicoceles corrective surgery fails to downgrade the initial fertility treatment option according to Samplaski et al.

No. of menIVF
(<5 million)
IUI
(5–9 million)
Natural
(>9 million)
IVF group post-surgery13947%21%32%
IUI group post-surgery6627%15%58%
Natural group post-surgery1687%10%83%
Table 6: Change in TMSC and recommended fertility treatment after varicocele surgery.

In this same study 40% of men (82/205), who initially required IVF or IUI treatment, recorded a sufficient TMSC post-surgery for natural conception. This corresponds with the results of Abdel-Meguid et al. which found 1 in 3 men achieve spontaneous pregnancy within 12 months following varicocele surgery.

Overall, most studies report that the greater the change in TPMSC (and TMSC) post-surgery the more likely the male will conceive naturally. A large increase in TMSC is most likely to occur among men with:

  • Larger varicoceles
  • Low testosterone
  • Elevated testicular shear-wave elastic modulus
  • Testicular atrophy

In men with normal sperm parameters, but elevated sperm DNA fragmentation, varicocelectomy significantly decreases DNA fragmentation after 12 months (14.8% vs. 22.3%).

DNA fragmentation index before and after varicocelectomy

However, only 1 in 3 of these men achieve spontaneous pregnancy during the 12-month follow-up period. This result highlights the need for men to undergo thorough examination of other known causes of infertility (i.e. anti-sperm antibodies, genetics etc) before electing for varicocele treatment.

References

Hamidi Madani A, et al. (2024). Fertility Rate and Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index following Varicocelectomy in Primary Infertile Men with Clinical Varicocele: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38368521/

Maimaitimin A, et al. (2023). Nomograms for Predicting Postoperative Sperm Improvements in Varicocele Patients. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168323025284

Liu L, et al. (2022). Nomogram for predicting spontaneous pregnancy after microscopic varicocelectomy in infertile men with normal hormone. https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-022-05125-9

Shomarufov A B, et al. (2021). Prediction of reproductive function recovery after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men from infertile couples: Clinical and laboratory predictors. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/and.14101

Teixeira T A, et al. (2019). Cut-off values of the Johnsen score and Copenhagen index as histopathological prognostic factors for postoperative semen quality in selected infertile patients undergoing microsurgical correction of bilateral subclinical varicocele. https://tau.amegroups.org/article/view/27212/html

Salama N, et al. (2018). Evaluation of Normal and Varicocele-Bearing Testes Using Real-time Strain Elastography. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jum.14730

Thirumavalavan N, et al. (2018). The Impact of Microsurgical Repair of Subclinical and Clinical Varicoceles on Total Motile Sperm Count: Is There a Difference? https://www.goldjournal.net/article/S0090-4295(18)30627-7/

Wang Q, et al. (2019). Outcome of varicocelectomy on different degrees of total motile sperm count: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19396368.2019.1655813

Chen S, (2017). Significant predictive factors for subfertility in patients with subclinical varicocele. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/and.12781

Samplaski M K, et al. (2017). Varicocelectomy to “upgrade” semen quality to allow couples to use less invasive forms of assisted reproductive technology. https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(17)30537-X/

Damsgaard J, et al. (2016). Varicocele Is Associated with Impaired Semen Quality and Reproductive Hormone Levels: A Study of 7035 Healthy Young Men from Six European Countries. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283816303967

Hayden R and Tanrikut C, et al. (2016). Testosterone and Varicocele. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094014316000100

Cantoro U, et al. (2015). Reassessing the role of subclinical varicocele in infertile men with impaired semen quality: a prospective study. https://www.goldjournal.net/article/S0090-4295(15)00041-2/

McGarry P, et al. (2015). Is varicocelectomy beneficial in men previously deemed subfertile but with normal semen parameters based on the new guidelines? A retrospective study. https://www.goldjournal.net/article/S0090-4295(14)01199-6/

Bozhedomov V A, et al. (2014). The role of the antisperm antibodies in male infertility assessment after microsurgical varicocelectomy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00254.x

García-Peiró A et al. (2014). Multiple Determinations of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Show That Varicocelectomy Is Not Indicated for Infertile Patients with Subclinical Varicocele. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/181396/

Grasso M, et al. (2014). Efficacy of spermatic vein ligation in patients affected by high grade left varicocele. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24642164/

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Male Reproduction and Urology, (2014). Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(14)02234-1/

Amann R P, (2013). Evaluating spermatogenesis using semen: the biology of emission tells why reporting total sperm per sample is important, and why reporting only number of sperm per milliliter is irrational. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2164/jandrol.108.006809

Abdel-Meguid T A, et al. (2011). Does Varicocele Repair Improve Male Infertility? An Evidence-Based Perspective From a Randomized, Controlled Trial. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283810011863

Tanrikut C, et al. (2011). Varicocele as a risk factor for androgen deficiency and effect of repair. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10030.x

Seo J T, et al. (2009). The significance of microsurgical varicocelectomy in the treatment of subclinical varicocele. https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(08)04809-7/

Allamaneni S, et al. (2004). Increased seminal reactive oxygen species levels in patients with varicoceles correlate with varicocele grade but not with testis size. https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(04)02437-9/

Taylor A, et al. (2003). Extent of the problem. https://www.bmj.com/content/327/7412/434

Unal D, et al. (2001). Clomiphene citrate versus varicocelectomy in treatment of subclinical varicocele: A prospective randomized study. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00289.x

Çulha M, et al. (1998). Comparison of Testicular Volumes before and after Varicocelectomy. https://karger.com/uin/article-abstract/60/4/220/307323/

Yamamoto M, et al. (1996). Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8627841/

Gorelick J I and Goldstein M, (1993). Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028216558099

Witt M A and Lipshultz L I, (1993). Varicocele: a progressive or static lesion? https://www.goldjournal.net/article/0090-4295(93)90268-F/

Dhabuwala C B, et al. (1992). Clinical versus subclinical varicocele: improvement in fertility after varicocelectomy. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001502821654970X

Pryor J L and Howards S S, (1987). Varicocele. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3303595/


fertilPEDIA

Low Sperm Count Overview

Low Sperm Count Overview

Low sperm count, also known as oligospermia or oligozoospermia, happens when a man has 15 million or less sperm per millilitre (mL) of…. Read more

Questions or comments?